Topic started by Fiona (@ ess-p-144-138-203-45.mega.tmns.net.au) on Mon Sep 17 05:12:39 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

Well, that was certainly a change, she wasn't good but rather bad and loving it. Her character was physcotic and never got punished, but she is an excellent actor who should be commended for her performance

Responses:

• From: 11 (@ 203.106.151.8) on: Mon Sep 17 06:34:14
  
  WHY TALK ABOUT THAT OLD BITCH, TALK SOMETHING USEFUL RATHER THAN TALKING ABOUT THAT FORMER POPULAR SOUTH INDIAN PORN ACTRESS IN 80'S!
  
  
• From: Raguvaran (@ 212.2.14.241) on: Mon Sep 17 08:33:19
  
  Fiona;
  
  Sher is not an excellent actor, but actress, she was good in the film, quite a different character
  
  
• From: Fiona (@ ess-p-144-138-203-209.mega.tmns.net.au) on: Tue Sep 18 04:48:11
  
  Raguvaran, thank you for pointing out the gramatical error. SOme people just never realise what a good actor or ACTRESS is made of like 11
  
  
  And 11 maybe you should go and stick your head down the toilet and learn some manners by talking to your decaying remains.
  
  
• From: vambu virumbi (@ 210.212.250.168) on: Thu Sep 27 19:16:57
  
  dont speak about raguvaran, the great in the place of nasty suhasini
  
  
• From: arukani (@ 210.186.113.7) on: Thu Oct 4 02:44:41
  
  arukani suhasini is really a good actress but in chocolate hmmmmmm i saw her eating cadburry alone
  
  
• From: arukani (@ 210.186.113.7) on: Thu Oct 4 02:44:48
  
  arukani suhasini is really a good actress but in chocolate hmmmmmm i saw her eating cadburry alone
  
  
• From: Fiona (@ ess-p-144-138-202-141.mega.tmns.net.au) on: Fri Oct 5 04:06:28
  
  Good one Arukani
  
  

Want to post a response?