Topic started by UnmaiVendhan (@ 203.199.231.246) on Thu Jan 3 13:00:48 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

Periyar has riducled and rubbished Kannagi Legend . In his article Published in Viduthalai of July 1951, Periyar has dismissed Kannagi Myth as a big bundle of thrash

Here is the online Link:


http://www.chennai.com/forums/ShowArticle.cfm?languageid=1&categoryid=1&subcategoryid=3&messageid=26&CFID=236459&CFTOKEN=90247297

Interestingly, Karunanidhi, who was in Public Life very much in 1951 has never protested against this views.

Responses:

• Old responses
  
• From: chhhhhhhh (@ 203.101.36.87) on: Mon Mar 15 00:40:40 EST 2004
  
  Idiappam you need a surgery for your brains, BAlls, kidneys and finally for your divine a$$.
  
  
• From: Surya (@ cache-ntc-ad02.proxy.aol.com) on: Mon Mar 15 21:00:50 EST 2004
  
  I thnk that that is bullshi* too kadamban. IF he said that superstition was bad and put slipper garlands on ganesh then why didn't he do it for jesus, does christianity not have superstition? Why didn't he do it on allah, does islam not have superstition?
  
  
• From: mannang katty (@ wc09.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Tue Mar 16 07:26:40 EST 2004
  
  Dravida Mania was created in the south during the British rule in order to separate south from mainstream Indians by British.
  
  Periyar tried to bring down brahmans only. He did not try to equate a BARBER with PALLAN or with any other castes.
  
  Brahmans are the important people of HINDU religion. Hindu religion is still the life line of India. Destruction of Hindu religion need anti-Brahman tirades.
  
  Attacking Brahmans was a tool used by Brits to separate Indians. That work well now.
  
  That is why British coolie Vajpayee and Karunanithi joined in politics. Anti-Brahmanic politician joined with a Brahmnic politicians.
  
  India have a Christian defense minister whose loyalty is not with India but with POPE who is still refuse to apologise for the crimes his catholic church commited in India.
  
  WHITES need India as a colony and not as a powerful nation. They use all the TACTICS to separate the Indians all the time.
  
  
• From: Surya (@ cache-ntc-ad02.proxy.aol.com) on: Tue Mar 16 21:49:05 EST 2004
  
  Vajpayee isn't anti bramin, neighter is he pro bramin.
  
  
• From: mannang katty (@ wc09.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Wed Mar 17 09:32:04 EST 2004
  
  Vajpayee is a Brahman but a British coolie like Karunanithi.
  
  They serve their common master well.
  
  
• From: Surya (@ cache-ntc-ad02.proxy.aol.com) on: Thu Mar 18 21:15:13 EST 2004
  
  HOw does Vajpayee sere the British?
  
  
• From: mannang katty (@ wc09.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Fri Mar 19 00:35:10 EST 2004
  
  Vajpayee's past tells how he betrayed Indian freedom fighters.
  
  
  
  
  
• From: satana (@ chatstowerfd.chats-deroy.wayne.edu) on: Sun Mar 28 18:50:27 EST 2004
  
  Hi guys,
  
  I see lotta responses about caste and stuff. Itz surprising that though periyar was against caste and seggeregation, and he made sea change in TN, why is that they ask for our caste in our admission sheets?
  
  itz a shame, that we still follow the practice of caste system, now with the help of government. By giving reservations, is it that the ' so called BC' accept shamelessly that they cannot compete on a fair ground with other people or they are just DUMB! i dont think so. I strongly think we guys were castist eunuchs, and shamefully remain same.
  
  
  
  
• From: TAMILAN (@ 203.199.220.144) on: Mon Mar 29 06:01:27 EST 2004
  
  periyar was not a tamilian. he promoted only some forward castes. he was jelous of brahmins. he was a third rated man married a young lady at his old age.
  
  
• From: mannang katty (@ wc09.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Tue Mar 30 13:29:15 EST 2004
  
  Jelous of what?
  
  You are a low caste and jelous of Mudalis and bark in different names.
  
  Your Church is now crying to get promoted their coolies like you to a HIGH CASTE.
  
  What a fun of your POPE!
  
  

Want to post a response?