Topic started by R.Chakravarthy (@ 202.156.2.245) on Thu Mar 8 22:57:56 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

We then had the British Raj.Now we have the Hindi Raj ! Are the Dravidians better off today under the Aryan Hindi Raj ruling India today or are they the worse off .Or is it a case of from the frying pan to the fire .Are the policies of the centre driving the Dravidians into secessionist mode? Do the South Indians really have a say so in their regional affairs in this millennium or one of just mere exploitation by the Hindi Raj of the South ?

Responses:

• Old responses
  
• From: query (@ ns3.ccsf.cc.ca.us) on: Thu Apr 1 21:55:50 EST 2004
  
  Why dravidian movement was not successful in karnataka and andhra? Do they have no feeling of being dravidian .Can anyone tell me?
  
  
• From: tony azggan (@ dialup-4.72.32.227.dial1.miami1.level3.net) on: Thu Apr 1 22:13:15 EST 2004
  
  Dr.Truth hurts: What a beillianr observation and deduction That only Dravidians are intelligent. I hope you mean 98% of Dravidians. We have to leave brahmins out. In Hindian States only 50% are intelligent. The khatriyas and Banias are also stupid as they are not considered backward. Only in South 98% are the cream and any one of the 98% could get a doctrate from Anna Unuversity and soon all the 98% will.
  I do not think any of the 98% will disagree with your research finding.That is the reason why 98% have to write yejjamnasuns and can pass with bonus marks alone. Let us all work for that.
  I am happy that you subscribe to the majority view and hope to get your co-operation to put 2% in concentration camps like Aushwitz.
  
  
• From: MALINI KURVIYENGAR (@ h-66-134-126-45.lsanca54.covad.net) on: Sat Apr 3 11:51:17 EST 2004
  
  HINDI AND HINDU RAJ:
  
  TAMILIANS CAN NEVER BE HINDUS IF THEY ARE NOT HINDI:
  ------------------------------------------------
  
  Hindi never belongs to one particular state the way hindu religion.
  
  if hindi belongs to one particular state or some particular state then hinduism also belongs to those states. You cannot differentiate between hindi-hindu.
  
  If tamilians are not Hindi, then they cannot be hindu also. It means they are budhist or jains originally forcibly converted to dalitism/hinduism by brahmins the way north Indians are trying to convert Tamil to hindi. and so tamilians to hinduism.
  
  
• From: hello (@ 203.101.35.54) on: Mon Apr 5 08:26:13 EDT 2004
  
  yes malini, Tamil is part of hindi langauge the way Tamilians are part of hinduism
  
  
• From: hello (@ 203.101.35.54) on: Mon Apr 5 08:27:06 EDT 2004
  
  Tamilians will go back to their original dravid jain religion or switch over to christianity, if they do not accetp hindi-hinduism.
  
  
• From: Idiappam (@ cache138.156ce.maxonline.com.sg) on: Mon Apr 5 12:40:21 EDT 2004
  
  'hello' said:
  
  //yes malini, Tamil is part of hindi langauge the way Tamilians are part of hinduism//
  
  //Tamilians will go back to their original dravid jain religion or switch over to christianity, if they do not accetp hindi-hinduism.//
  
  Your brain is splintered just like your brain. Get your fact straight before you shoot your mouth off!
  
  
  
• From: tamilian (@ 203.101.38.37) on: Mon Apr 5 15:16:38 EDT 2004
  
  Hindi belongs to Hinduism and hindus.
  
  
• From: mannang katty (@ wc09.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Tue Apr 6 02:44:50 EDT 2004
  
  Hindi will rule whole India, including Tamilnadu the way hinduism is ruling in India. You like it or not , that is your individual taste and perception. Geno aka idiappam make a note of it. Your fraudism will not survive for long atleast in India.
  
  
• From: davie (@ ip-200-56-233-5-mx.marcatel.net.mx) on: Sat Oct 30 16:13:55
  
  hell with hindi and hindus...
  we are great loongi tigers of LTTE
  
  
• From: davie (@ s0030140939) on: Mon Nov 8 22:14:53 EST 2004
  
  i) caste in ancient india was based on character rather than color or birth. eg) thieves were assumed lowest caste
  ii) dark people and non brahmins ruled india especially the south infact they constituted many brahmins. So there is no doubt that dark brahmins who are present today were existing even before a 2000 years as brahmins.
  iii) dravidian kings ruled south india
  iv) All indians are immigrants into india at one period or the other for a time span of 25000 yrs. The list includes aryans and dravidians.
  BRAHMINS and BRAHMINISM WERE PRESENT IN INDIA EVEN BEFORE ARYAN INVASION
  
  
• From: davie (@ universi-bh1wsz) on: Thu Nov 18 05:59:14 EST 2004
  
  
  let me repeat this like a old tape recorder
  Shudras are business men
  Brahmins are priests
  Khastrias are warriors
  vaishyas are business men
  caste was not based on color
  south indian kings respected sanskrit and tamil equally
  different castes in india represent different groups.
  So called SC STs and categorization of castes was done while framing indian costitution. Brahmi9ns should not be rated as FC. They are not superior. Similarly vanniars should not be classified as SC. coz vanniars are just like any other caste in TN. These are errors while framing new indian constitution
  
  

Want to post a response?